ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 76 Issue 03
نویسنده
چکیده
Two studies examined the influence of transient affective states and issue framing on issue interpretation and risk taking within the context of strategic decision making. In Study 1, participants in whom transient positive or negative affective states were induced by reading a short story showed systematic differences in issue interpretation and risk taking in a strategic decision making context. Compared to negative mood participants, those in a positive mood were more likely to interpret the strategic issue as an opportunity and displayed lower levels of risk taking. Study 2 replicated and extended these results by crossing affective states with threat and opportunity frames. Results showed that framing an issue (as a threat or an opportunity) had a stronger impact on issue interpretation among negative affect participants than among positive affect participants. Affective states also moderated the impact of issue framing on risk taking: the effect of framing on risk-taking was stronger under negative rather than positive affect. These results are interpreted via information-processing and motivational effects of affect on a decision maker. q 1998 Academic Press
منابع مشابه
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 76 Issue 02
Accentuate the positive or accentuate the negative? The literature has been mixed as to how the alternative framing of information in positive or negative terms affects judgments and decisions. We argue that this is because different studies have employed different operational definitions of framing and thus have tapped different underlying processes. We develop a typology to distinguish betwee...
متن کاملORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 75 Issue 03
The present study attempted to determine the relationship between affective disposition and the favorability of letters of reference. We hypothesized that individuals with positive dispositions would write more favorable letters than would individuals with less positive or neutral dispositions. In addition, we also hypothesized that length of letter would partly mediate the relationship between...
متن کاملORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol.74 Issue 02
Previous studies have revealed surprising and persistent cross-cultural variations in overconfidence, whereby respondents in some Asian cultures (e.g., Chinese) exhibit markedly higher degrees of overconfidence than respondents in other cultures (e.g., in the United States and Japan). Most of those demonstrations have entailed general knowledge tasks (e.g., answering We are especially grateful ...
متن کاملORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 74 Issue 02
Heinrich’s (1931) classical study implies that most industrial accidents can be characterized as a probabilistic result of human error. The present research quantifies Heinrich’s observation and compares four descriptive models of decision making in the abstracted setting. The suggested quantification utilizes signal detection theory (Green & Swets, 1966). It shows that Heinrich’s observation c...
متن کاملORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, Vol. 75 Issue 02
Two studies attempted to discriminate between a situationaleconomic and a cultural explanation for the recently reported finding that Chinese from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) are more risk-seeking than Americans. Both studies compared American and Chinese proverbs related to risk and risk-taking. The first study added Germany as a control group for its socioeconomic similarity to the U...
متن کامل